PDA

View Full Version : Brazil (Terry Gilliam, 1985) The Visions of DZ-015


Lsogn
10-12-2009, 07:40 PM
Thrown into a swirling vortex of confusion, viewers of “Brazil” by Director Terry Gilliam are forced to navigate the oftentimes terrifying boundaries between waking and dreaming, self and state, impulse and restraint, freedom and servitude and ultimately--falsehoods and truth. For 142 anxiety producing minutes, Gilliam assaults the audience with a stream of fractured visuals and a disjointed progression of events in the life and mind of Sam Lowry, a young man entrenched in a monotonous career which is, itself, part of a larger repressive and totalitarian society.

How “Brazil” presents itself to viewers is one distinct way Gilliam’s satirical creation deviates from other films. “Brazil” relies on a heavy-handed use of imagery and sound to push the film forward. Yes, there is dialogue between the characters, but it is often voiced in a clipped and staccato form, exuding more cliché than genuine sincerity. There are limited instances of dynamic and organically created conversational exchanges between Lowry and his coworkers, with his mother, Ida, or even with Jill, the object of love within his visions and varying states of consciousness. For example, early in the film, Lowry’s mother asks him, “...hopes, wishes, dreams? You must want something?” Lowry replies, “No, not even dreams.”

Whether he actually wants his dreams and what he discovers in them or not, it is precisely within this realm that Lowry finds an escape from the tyranny “...and nightmare of the day to day existence” of his life. Roughly ten minutes into “Brazil” the question is raised, “Has anybody seen Sam Lowry?” This is when Lowry first surfaces and the answer is found in visual footage and not through the exchange of spoken dialogue. Adorning wings and taking flight upward through nebulous clouds, Lowry escapes the gravitational tug of earthbound mortals. Larger than life, Lowry’s quest: to find and rescue the archetypal blonde goddess of his dreams. In the byzantine layers of his mind he is free, yet at the same time his portrayed existence remains complicated.

Saying that visual reality is emphasized over dialogue doesn’t mean to imply that words themselves are not important. Quite the contrary--words are scattered throughout “Brazil” in written format on posters lining office walls, in shopping plazas and along busy streets. “Brazil” is visual, nonverbal--yet literate. Multiple examples of the written word are visible to the observant viewer. The most common and recurring poster image is of a “Norman Rockwellian” family on a car trip with the words: “Happiness--We’re all in this together.” A scene near the end of “Brazil” reveals a cross-over between the visual and the verbal “realities” of the film. After Tuttle switches around the ducts in Lowry’s apartment, Lowry peers through a window to see what happens to the workers inside. Their biohazard suits fill with brown liquid and Lowry exclaims, “Shit!” Tuttle responds with a laugh, “We’re all in it together, kid!”

Other examples of written phrases found in “Brazil” include: Suspicion Breeds Confidence, The Truth Shall Make You Free, Luxury Without Fear, Do Not Suspect A Friend--Report Him, Away Day Travel, Be Safe--Be Suspicious, Who Can You Trust? and Utopia Airways. In addition, there are reminders scattered throughout to: Keep The City Tidy. The pacing of these words and phrases in “Brazil” is similar to the Burma Shave advertising signs extending across the roadways of America in earlier decades. Besides being observable on posters, words are also spontaneously written by characters within the film. For example, when Lowry writes “I Love You” to Jill on the windshield while she is driving.

When compared to the elaborately constructed settings of this film, written words are just one small piece of the visual landscape of “Brazil.” In scene after scene, viewers are confronted with a very chaotic and disjointed reality that is filled with wires and machines that never function correctly. This is especially true with the ornate duct systems found in homes and offices which appear at times to take on a life of their own. Lowry’s apartment becomes increasingly filled with wires and mechanical mishaps and represents how physically and mentally stuck he is in this mediated and highly monitored environment. Other important features of the visual design of “Brazil” are all the instances where environments are designed to emphasize the diminishing importance of the individual such as in the cavernous office of drone-like workers and in Lowry’s torture scene at the end where his helpless insignificance is overemphasized by the engulfing walls.

For viewers of “Brazil,” confusion is part of the visceral response to the unfolding images, sounds, dialogues and actions on the screen. Sitting in suspended and jaw-dropping disbelief, experiencing one jolt of Red Bull visual after another, we feel what Lowry feels as he reels from the continuous bombardment of the multiple layers of reality in which he lives. Sometimes his gut-wrenching response is externally induced from a poster on a wall, the sudden falling through the ceiling of terrorists or the age-defying changes on his mother’s face. Other times the source of the attack comes from within the deep synapses of his own mind when he grapples with the confusing authenticity of his visions and various states of wakefulness and dreaming. At issue throughout “Brazil” is the tug and pull of arguments and rhetoric coming at us and whether we are persuaded and swept away by them or remain immune to their powerful hold.

chillburke
10-13-2009, 12:21 PM
The poster in Brazil which reads “Suspicion Breeds Confidence” should read “Suspicion Breeds Incompetence.” People have been reduced to mere cogs in a dangerously incompetent machine: the Leviathan that is the Government. People’s uselessness and disposability comes from two directions: their over-reliance on technology, and the bureaucratic tyranny of their power structure. Each man does a tiny part of the work for one department among many, and so he does not have skills to improvise or deal with irregularities. A mere refund check is enough to cause a nervous breakdown. Not only can there be no pride in one’s work or any ambition for betterment, there is also absolutely no accountability. When the machine malfunctions, each cog points to another as a source for the problem.

I wonder if anyone else thought it was interesting that the two rogue figures in the film (Tuttle and Jill) have American accents, and the rest of the characters are British. Is this a reference to the way British people think of Americans (i.e. independent, rebellious, uncouth, dangerous, self-liberated)?

I also like the distinction between the traditional quote from the Bible, “The truth shall set you free”, and the poster from the film which read, “The Truth Shall Make You Free”. I love the small tinges of tyranny everywhere! This film is wonderfully detail oriented. I feel I need to see it about a hundred more times to notice all the brilliant details.

Jamespshanahan
10-13-2009, 03:33 PM
It is interesting to think about the world of “Brazil” as a dystopian present rather than thinking about it as a time in the future. Early in the film the interview with the Prime Minister or whatever important government figurehead he was is useful in revealing that the world is not all-pervasive. The interviewer mentions that the bombing campaign of the “terrorists” has been going on for thirteen years. Thirteen years is an inordinately long period of time for any modern war. Yet the government figurehead waves it off as “beginner’s luck.” There are some very rich parallels that can be drawn from this. The fact that the Ministry of Information is the largest entity within the government shows that the prevailing attitude is the acquisition and storage of personal information. What is this information even used for? Simply to keep a population under wraps?

The way the movie ends also leaves the viewer with a sense of the personal finality of oppressive tyranny. Maybe in the world of “Brazil” the “terrorists” eventually are able to overthrow the governmental regime. Maybe things eventually become more egalitarian and peaceful for the residents of this world. Yet Sam Lowry is still a destroyed man for whom the world is over. Even if things become better any regime like the one in place here destroys so many people that it becomes difficult to see the gains made because they are all soaked in blood and suffering.

klandis
10-13-2009, 05:05 PM
I also enjoyed the strategically placed messages and props throughout Terry Gilliam’s Brazil. This is a film that I will watch again and again and undoubtedly discover new details each time. Another detail I remember is the graphitic word “REALITY” scattered throughout the scene where Lowry visits the Buttle household. The word is clearly emphasizing the tumultuous shift in scenery and alerts us to the difference between social classes. The word also stresses the fact that Lowry does not have much experience dealing with the setting before him, possibly hinting at his loss of touch with reality as his dream sequences become more frequent.

Other aspects of the scenery helped to create an oppressed atmosphere. For example, in one of Lowry’s last dream sequences he is running frantically from numerous monsters when he is confronted by a never-ending pile of ducts and various electronic equipment. There are many forces oppressing mankind in the film, and technology is only one of these forces.

I really like chillburke’s comment noting that Tuttle and Jill are the only two characters in the film without British accents. I think this was used to separate them further from society. They feel alienated by the world around them. Their aversion to society is represented with their use of a different dialect.

ehiggins
10-14-2009, 11:57 AM
After watching “Brazil”, it’s become obvious that we can in no way see all the elements of the movie on the first, second, third, or even tenth viewing. The camera soaks in so much visual information that it is nearly painful for the brain to try and comprehend what it all means. This in itself is a statement that the movie is making. It illustrates the confusion of the main character Mr. Lowry, by submerging us into his world of information and chaos. It is no wonder why he escapes into his world of dreams so frequently.

It’s interesting to note that when Lowry’s life is going well, or as well as can be expected, his dreams are of a heavenly lady and him flying in the clouds above the natural world. This shows his relative contentedness. When he’s having good dreams, he isn’t questioning the place that he holds in the government. He doesn’t seem to find it corrupt or wrong. Yet as his life becomes more difficult, he questions his leadership and he finds the blond love of his life and cannot protect her, his dreams become worse as well. These dreams serve as an insight into what is happening in the movie and how we should feel if we are too lost to understand what is going on.